The Potential Role of Nutrition in Modulating the Long-Term Consequences of Early-Life Stress

74 min read /

The first 1,000 days of life, starting at conception and ending around 2 years of age, form a critical developmental time window in which envi-ronmental factors exert a powerful influence on later health outcomes. Increasing evidence from preclinical and clinical studies demonstrate that early-life stress (e.g., premature birth, parental neglect/abuse, hospitaliza-tion) lastingly affects brain function and cognition and increases vulner-ability to psychopathology later in life. The mechanisms involved remain elusive. Structural changes in the brain of children exposed to early-life stress have been found and may contribute to the lasting detrimental effects. Interestingly, similar impairments to those observed following early-life stress are found in children exposed to perinatal malnutrition [1]. Knowing that stress and nutrition are closely interrelated and that they can affect one another, it is important to understand the role of nutrition in the context of programming by early-life adversity and explore the option of protective nutritional interventions. Unraveling the important intersection between stress and nutrition in the context of early-life adversity is crucial, especially for premature infants, in which both high levels of stress and malnutrition are common. We here describe several mechanistic pathways underlying the programming effects of early-life stress and discuss the role of nutrition in these processes. For example:

1.    Stressful experiences in early life can alter the settings of the HPA axis. Alterations in HPA axis dynamics cause a change in the circulating levels of stress hormones (glucocorticoids) and are considered to directly alter the brain and mediate the lasting effects of early-life adversity. Glu-cocorticoids are important in glucose metabolism, and thus are tightly related to energy availability and nutrition. The HPA axis also responds to nutritional stimuli indirectly, such as through the metabolic hormones leptin and ghrelin. In addition, a disbalance in protein and fat intake has shown to alter HPA axis dynamics [1].
2.    Several studies have shown that epigenetic mechanisms, targeted at specific genes but also genome wide, mediate the programming effects of early-life adversity. Interestingly, methylation pathways can be regulated by dietary factors, including micronutrients [2].
3.    Early-life adversity can generate oxidative stress. Oxidative mol-ecules can have an impact on key transcription factors and can therefore alter many important reactions that affect development and subsequently influence later life health. The developing brain is particularly sensitive to injury by oxidant molecules. Antioxidant nutrients, provided through the diet, can counteract the detrimental adverse effects of oxidative stress [3].
4.    Early-life adversity is known to lastingly activate the immune sys-tem. Inflammatory molecules can interact with all of the above-described mechanisms and are known to have an impact on the brain and on essential processes involved in neurodevelopment. Some specific nutrients, like fatty acids, have been found to exert anti-inflammatory effects [4].

All the above-mentioned mechanistic pathways are likely to interact with one another, and it is plausible to assume that the lasting effect of early-life adversity will be determined by the combined action of the different pathways and can be modulated by nutritional management (Fig. 1). This is complex, but also opens a window of opportunity for the development of nutritional interventions. Animal studies demonstrated that nutritional supplementation with, among others, fatty acids, micronutrients, or antioxidants, modulates (some of) the lasting consequences of early-life stress on adult brain function and health [5]. In humans, this is not fully studied yet. Future studies should aim to investigate whether optimizing/supplementing nutrition could play a role in diminishing the detrimental effects of early-life stress. In addition to stress reduction pro-grams and family integrated care, the development of nutritional inter-ventions to reduce the negative effects of early-life stress in humans would be very promising as nutritional interventions are relatively safe, inex-pensive, and easy to implement and may significantly improve short- and long-term child health with subsequent economic and societal benefits.

References

1    Lucassen PJ, Naninck EFG, van Goudoever JB, et al. Perinatal programming of adult hippocampal structure and function; emerging roles of stress, nutrition and epigenetics. Trends Neurosci. 2013 Nov;36(11):621-31.
2    Stevens AJ, Rucklidge JJ, Kennedy MA. Epigenetics, nutrition and mental health. Is there a relationship? Nutr Neurosci. 2018 Nov;21(9):602-613.
3    Bjorklund G, Chirumbolo S. Role of oxidative stress and antioxidants in daily nutrition and human health. Nutrition. 2017 Jan;33:311-321.
4    Hoeijmakers L, Lucassen PJ, Korosi A. The interplay of early-life stress, nutrition, and immune activation programs adult hippocampal structure and function. Front Mol Neurosci. 2015 Jan;7:103.
5    Naninck EFG, Oosterink JE, Korosi A, et al. Early micronutrient supplementation protects against early stress-induced cognitive impairments. FASEB J. 2017 Feb;31(2):505-518.
 

Abstract

Stress exposure during sensitive developmental periods lastingly affects brain function and cognition and increases vulnerability to psychopathology later in life, as established in various preclinical and clinical studies. Interestingly, similar patterns are seen in children who suffer from perinatal malnutrition. Stress and malnutrition can act closely aligned and stress and nutrition interact. There is emerging evidence that specific nutritional supplementation during various time windows may ameliorate the long-lasting effects of early-life stress, although possible mechanistic insights in this process are sparsely reported. Understanding how stress exposure in early-life influences brain development, and understanding the role of nutrition in this process, is essential for the development of effective (nutritional) therapies to improve long-term health in children exposed to early-life stress. This is especially important in the situation of preterm birth where both stress exposure and malnutrition are common. Here, we will discuss the programming effects of early-life stress, the possible underlying mechanisms, how nutrients impact on this process, and the promising role of nutrition in modulating (some of) the lasting consequences of early-life stress on brain function and health in adulthood.

The Importance of the Early-Life Environment

The first 1,000 days of life, starting at conception up to approximately 2 years of age, form a critical window in which environmental factors may exert a powerful influence on later health outcomes. This concept is often referred to as the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease [1]. In particular, the first 1,000 days are a period of rapid central nervous system (CNS) development, in which many processes take place, among myelination, neurogenesis, synaptogenesis, cortical layering, and neural circuitry formation throughout various parts in the brain [2]. Environmental factors like stress, but also nutrition, can profoundly influence early brain development [3].

Early-life adversity includes a wide range of experiences, including malnutrition and different forms of stress, among physical stress (e.g., prematurity, prolonged hospital admission, pain) and emotional stress (e.g., parental neglect, physical or emotional abuse). Indeed, increasing evidence from preclinical and clinical studies shows that early-life adversity lastingly affects cognitive functions and increases vulnerability to psychopathology later in life [4-6], although the underlying mechanisms remain elusive.

During fetal and early postnatal life, the brain is the fastest growing organ, thus very high in energy and nutrient demand [7] and therefore very sensitive to malnutrition [8]. There is emerging evidence suggesting that nutrition might play a key role in modulating the effects of early-life stress [9]. Unraveling the important intersection between stress and nutrition in the context of early-life adversity is crucial, especially for premature infants, in which both high levels of stress and malnutrition are common.

First, we will briefly discuss how early-life stress and malnutrition impact on the brain and later life health. Secondly, we will discuss the possible mechanisms involved, with a focus on nutrition. Finally, we will discuss the promising pre- clinical evidence for nutritional interventions in the prevention of the detrimental effects of early-life stress.
Understanding how stress in early-life influences brain development and un-derstanding how nutrition impacts on this process is essential for the development of effective nutritional therapies to improve long-term health in (preterm) children exposed to early-life stress.             

Early-Life Stress and Malnutrition: A Long-Lasting Mark

Over the past decades, an increasing number of studies have identified associa-tions between adverse early-life experiences and a broad range of later-life health outcomes. Indeed, early-life stress is associated with an increased risk of cardio-vascular disease, cancer, obesity, and type 2 diabetes mellitus [10]. It is also as-sociated with adverse neurodevelopment and higher rates of mental illnesses like cognitive decline [11], anxiety, and depression in adulthood [10].

The programming effects of early-life stress begin already at conception. In-trauterine life represents one of the most sensitive developmental periods, when the effects of stress are transmitted intergenerationally from a mother to her unborn child as described in many clinical [12, 13] and preclinical [14] studies. For example, high maternal pregnancy-specific anxiety was associated with impaired executive functioning in the children at 7 years of age [15].

Adverse experiences in early life continue to affect an individual’s long-term health after birth. Lower maternal affection in early life predicts emotional distress in adulthood [16] and in (pre)term neonates, moderate touch reduced reactivity to stress at adult ages [17]. Animal studies show that adult offspring born to mothers engaging in low levels of licking and grooming behavior increased anxiety-like behavior and physical responses to stress [18, 19]. Interestingly, stroking (simulating of maternal tactile stimuli) reversed these effects [20].

Similar to early-life stress, early-life malnutrition is associated with longterm adverse effects on neurocognitive development, mental health, and behavior. During the sensitive periods of fetal and early neonatal life, even minor nutritional insufficiencies can have adverse long-term effects since they can permanently change brain structure and function [8]. Although all nutrients are necessary for brain growth, key nutrients that support neurodevelopment include macronutrients such as fatty acids and proteins, and micronutrients such as iron, choline, folate, iodine, and vitamins [21]. The effects of undernutrition during pregnancy on adult outcomes have been studied in the Dutch and Chinese famine studies. Individuals exposed to famine prenatally showed poorer visual-motor skills, mental flexibility, and selective attention in a cognitive task in adulthood compared to a control group; furthermore, there were more mental health problems such as anxiety and depression, suggesting a long-lasting negative effect of maternal undernutrition during pregnancy [22, 23].

After birth, the neonate derives its nutrients ideally through breast milk. Dif-ferences in breast milk nutrient composition have been associated with child development, for example a positive relation between DHA amounts in breast milk and neurodevelopment of the infants has been shown [24]. More research this area is needed to better identify the key beneficial components of breast milk for optimal development.

An important condition in which both stress as well as nutritional deficiencies play an important role, is preterm birth. In the last decades, neonatal care has been greatly improved; however, preterm born infants often suffer from long-term psychosocial and neurodevelopmental sequelae including impairments in language skills, memory [25], and executive functions [26]. Preterm infants are separated frequently from their mothers after birth and are exposed to a stressful environment with invasive procedures, interruption of sleep states, shifts in environmental temperature and noise. Also, hits like infections, hypoxic-ischemic insults, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia play a role in long-term detrimental effects. During this period, malnutrition is also playing an important role since administering the right amount of nutrients is still challenging in preterm born infants. One of the most important predicting factors in development after preterm birth is growth rate of the infant, which can be improved significantly by adequate nutrition [27]. Thus, understanding the contribution of the stress, nutrition, and their intersect in the context of preterm care and optimizing this might lead to great advances in long-term health outcomes for preterm born infants.

The precise mechanisms underlying the detrimental and persistent impact of early-life stress on long-term health are currently unknown, even though some structural and functional changes in the brain following early-life stress have been identified. For example, human studies show that early-life stress is associated with a reduction in gray matter volume [28], decreased hippocampal volume [29], and functional and structural changes in cortical/limbic circuits, in particular the prefrontal cortex and the amygdala at different ages later in life [30-32]. Different kinds of abuse seem to be associated with cortical thinning in adulthood [33] and a smaller hippocampus [34, 35]. In line with the human evidence, preclinical models of early-life stress showed impairments of spatial and declarative memory [36] and showed associations with a number of alterations in hippocampal structure, neuronal plasticity [37], and age-dependent changes in adult hippocampal neurogenesis levels [38]. In addition, other experimental animal studies in a wide variety of species demonstrate similar links between early-life stress, brain anatomy/function and mental health throughout life.

Next to early-life stress, perinatal malnutrition shows lasting changes in the brain. For example, in humans, prenatal undernutrition is negatively correlated with total brain volumes at age 68 in men [39], and in animal models, pre- and postnatal iron deficiency is associated with structural and functional changes in the hippocampus [40].

When considering the lasting effects of early-life stress, it is interesting to consider them in an evolutionary perspective. The effects of early-life stress are mostly adaptive responses, to render an individual most fit to the predicted en-vironment. In fact, there is initial evidence that early-life stress, rather than just exerting negative effects, might prepare the offspring to respond optimally under stressful circumstances later in life. This concept is known as the matchmismatch theory [37, 41] and needs further investigation [42].

Considering the observed similarities in neurocognitive, mental, and behavioral outcomes between children exposed to perinatal malnutrition and to early- life stress [43], and the converging mechanisms and interplay between the regulation of stress and the food system, it is interesting to further explore how we can exploit these features. In the next section, we will discuss the possible underlying mechanisms for the long-lasting consequences of early-life stress, and we will discuss how nutrition might be able to impact on these processes.

The Impact of Nutrition on the Programming Pathways of Early-Life Stress

Some of the mechanistic pathways that have been suggested to underlie the pro-gramming effects of early-life stress can also be influenced by nutrition; these include among others: (1) the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis; (2) epigenetic mechanisms; (3) oxidative stress; (4) the immune system.

HPA Axis and Glucose Homeostasis

The HPA axis, with glucocorticoids as its end product, is the main neuroen-docrine stress system and regulates many body processes, including glucose ho-meostasis. Early-life stress induces alterations in HPA axis dynamics [44]. Such changes are considered to be instrumental in the link between early-life stress and subsequent brain development. In fact, early-life activation of the HPA axis programs behavioral responses to stress for life, which, in turn, may be a trigger for psychopathology [45]. Studies show that increased cortisol levels in infants are associated with adverse neurodevelopment in childhood [46]. Glucocorticoids are key regulators of glucose homeostasis. During fasting, concentrations of glucocorticoids rise, allowing the release of stored glucose. Moreover, nutritional stimuli, such as the metabolic hormone leptin, have shown to dampen the stress system. Chronic leptin treatment early in life leads to lifelong altered stress-induced HPA axis activity and changes in the hippocampus of rats [47]. In addition, imbalanced perinatal protein and fat intakes have shown to affect HPA axis dynamics [44]. How nutrients interact with glucocorticoids and metabolic hormones is not yet clear and warrants more research.

Epigenetic Mechanisms and Micronutrients

Epigenetic mechanisms determine whether a gene is transcribed or repressed without changing the DNA sequence. In contrast to the genome, the epigenome is dynamic, allowing adaptation to the environment. Over the past few years, a growing body of evidence has implicated epigenetic mechanisms in mediating persistent effects of early-life stress [48]. There is evidence that the epigenome is also affected more globally. For example, whole genome DHA methylation is different between children who were institutionalized and children that were raised by their biological parents [49]. Differences in the amount of perinatal nutrition, including periconceptional nutrition availability [50], are able to cause lasting modifications in DNA methylation and chromatin structure as well [19]. Early-life stress and malnutrition have both been shown to affect acetylation of histones [51]. Thereby, methylation pathways are regulated by dietary factors, both directly but also through provision of methyl groups (vitamin B12, methionine, and choline). Pregnant animals lacking methylation levels in specific gene regions that were fed a methyl-rich diet, produced healthy offspring with high methylation levels in these gene regions [52].

Oxidative Stress and Dietary Antioxidants

Early-life stressful experiences can generate oxidative stress. Oxidative molecules can have an impact on key transcription factors that influence cell signaling pathways involved in proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. Therefore, oxidative stress can alter many important reactions that affect development and subsequently influence later life health. The developing brain is particularly sensitive to injury to oxidant molecules [53]. For example, do Prado et al. [54] found oxidative damage in adolescents who were exposed to maltreatment in early life. Antioxidants provided by the diet, such as polyphenol and certain vi-tamins and minerals, can counteract the detrimental effects of oxidative mole-cules [55]. Providing adequate nutrition to premature infants can also boost the antioxidant defense mechanisms [56].

Immune System and Fatty Acids

Early-life stress can activate the neuroimmune system via inflammatory pathways within the CNS. Early-life stress induces an immediate immunosuppressive state, but in the long-term, this changes to a proinflammatory state, which triggers secretion of inflammatory molecules [57]. Inflammatory molecules can interact with all of the above-described mechanisms and are known to affect the brain. Moreover, the primary immunocompetent cells of the CNS itself, microglia and astrocytes, are involved in several aspects of brain development and function [58]. Activation of the immune system in early life is associated with (neuro)psychopathologies in adulthood, including cognitive dysfunction [59]. For instance, inflammation during pregnancy is associated with lower IQ in adult men [60]. In addition, pre- and postnatal activation of the immune system have been associated with anxiety-like and depressive-like behavior and cognitive im-pairments in adulthood [61]. Next to early-life stress, also early-life nutritional insults can affect the neuroimmune system. There are indications for an asso-ciation between circulating leptin levels and a reduced lymphoproliferative re-sponse and proinflammatory cytokine secretion in protein-malnourished infants [62]. Moreover, some specific nutrients have shown to have anti-inflammatory effects, either by directly influencing the immune system or by diminishing oxidative stress, such as fatty acids, polyphenols, and carotenoids [63]. For example, dietary fatty acids have been shown to have a protective effect against many immune-related diseases [64].

Above, a few examples of programming mechanistic pathways for the long- lasting effects of early-life stress, via which nutrients may impact, are mentioned. By no means is this meant to be exhaustive as clearly many other factors and mechanisms have been suggested to play a role in this complex programming of early-life stress such as the microbiome [65].

Importantly, in most studies, the above-described elements (stress and nutri-tion) and the mechanisms underlying early-life programming are addressed in-dividually. These studies mostly focus on a specific brain region or even cell type. Considering that these mechanisms may have interactions with one another, it is likely that the final effect will be determined by the synergistic action of the different pathways, as depicted in Figure 1. The effects of nutrition on the pro-gramming of early-life adversity are complex but may open a window of oppor-tunity for intervention.



The Interplay between Early-Life Factors: Nutritional Interventions

In this section, we will describe some of the evidence for nutritional interventions to mitigate the long-lasting detrimental effects of early-life stress [9], which is largely based on preclinical evidence. For example, supplementation of macronutrients in the form of fat and fatty acids has been shown to prevent the lasting neurocognitive consequences of early-life adversity [66-68]. For example, the offspring of prenatally stressed rats had improved neurocognitive and behavioral outcomes (i.e., protective effect on hippocampus, reduced anxiety, and improved social behavior) if fed a high-fat diet throughout pregnancy and lactation compared with a regular diet [66, 67]. In addition, Yam et al. [68] found that increasing the availability of omega-3 fatty acid early-life stress-induced cognitive impairments associated with a rescue of the early-life stress-induced changes in microglia and neurogenesis. Similarly, early dietary supplementation with essential micronutrients protected against early stress-induced cognitive impairments associated with the blunting of the early- life stress-induced HPA axis hyperactivation [69]. Additionally, choline supplementation to dams during pregnancy and lactation mitigates the effects of in utero stress exposure on adult anxiety-related behaviors [70]. Lastly, Yajima et al. [71] showed that neuronal abnormalities induced by early-life stress in both offspring and mothers may be partially ameliorated by dietary lutein supplementation.

In humans, studies that particularly focus on the effect of nutrition in case of early-life stress are scarce as studying the nutrition-stress interaction in the human setting is difficult, as so many other factors impact on child outcomes. A growing body of evidence found beneficial effects of supplementation with different macro- and micronutrients in developing countries where early-life stress and malnutrition are common. These suggest that several nutrients have a potential beneficial effect on the lasting consequences of early-life adversity, even though stress was not specifically assessed in these studies. An observational study in humans suggests that adequate dietary intakes of the minerals zinc and selenium protect against the adverse effects of prenatal stress exposure on child neurodevelopment [72]. In addition, a low omega-3 to omega-6 ratio in the pre-natal diet combined with high prenatal stress resulted in a lower score for orien-tation and regulation at age 6 months, but only among the children of Afro- American women [73]. Furthermore, prenatal dietary insufficiency of key anti-oxidant micronutrients was found to exacerbate the effects of prenatal stress on offspring affective behavior [72]. Lastly, Barker et al. [74] demonstrated that a broadly “unhealthy” prenatal and postnatal maternal dietary pattern mediated the adverse effects of prenatal maternal depression on child cognitive function at 8 years of age.

With greater survival rates in premature infants, behavioral and neurocogni- tive outcomes have become more relevant. Nutritional supplementation studies in preterm infants have shown beneficial effects on neurocognitive development, even after adjusting for confounding factors (i.e., gestational age at delivery, birth weight, and comorbidities). Increased cumulative intakes of energy, protein [75], and lipids [76] have been associated with better developmental outcomes, while the effects of micronutrient supplementation on neurocogni- tive, mental, and behavioral outcomes in preterm infants, show varying results [77, 78].

In conclusion, early-life nutrition appears to be an appealing candidate for modulating, at least partially, the lasting consequences of early-life stress on adult brain function and health.

Future Perspectives

Early-life stress and perinatal malnutrition lastingly alter brain, behavior, and mental health. This review discussed the rich complexity of the mechanisms un-derlying its programming effects and emphasizes that still little is known about the exact working and interplay of these pathways.

Over the last years, there has been increased attention to the prevention of the detrimental consequences of stressful experiences in early life. Stress reduction programs for both parents and (preterm) children have been developed [79, 80], and the advantages of family-integrated care are being acknowledged increasingly [81-83].
Specific nutritional support may act as a powerful tool to modify the adverse effects of early-life stress. In animal studies, nutritional supplementations under stressful conditions have shown promising results and seem to be able to modulate the lasting consequences of the early-life stress. In humans, nutritional sup-plementation in early life has shown beneficial effects; however, up to date, no studies have taken the stress aspects into account within this context. Of note, no studies have been performed to try to counteract or reverse the pathways that lead to the adverse effects of early-life stress in humans. Thereby, the existing evidence is limited by the number of available studies, the heterogeneity of the study designs and the inability to control for confounding variables. Future studies should focus on collecting longitudinal data, unraveling underlying mechanisms in humans, and translating this knowledge into the development of early targeted (nutritional) interventions.

Some of the animal studies show that a nutritional supplement to the lactating dam helps to prevent the lasting effects of early-life stress in her offspring. This raises the question whether breastfeeding also plays a role in the modulation of early-life stress effects in humans. There is initial evidence that maternal stress levels are related to the immunological properties [84] and the microbiome [85] of human milk, but given the above, it could be hypothesized that stress also changes the nutrient composition of breast milk and subsequently the nutrient availability for the infant, which both could be normalized by maternal supplementation. Nutritional supplementation to the mother may be an effective tool in improving the outcome of the offspring. Our ongoing prospective cohort study in the Netherlands is currently investigating the impact of maternal stress on breast milk nutritional composition.

Next to stress reduction programs like family integrated care, the development of nutritional interventions to reduce the adverse effects of early-life stress is promising as nutritional interventions are relatively safe, inexpensive, and easy to implement. To be able to develop nutritional interventions for humans (pregnant/lactating mothers and infant), understanding the timing of critical developmental periods and the mechanisms and interactions involved in the programming of early-life adversity is crucial. Combining these factors may sig-nificantly improve short- and long-term child health with subsequently economic and societal benefits in children exposed to early-life stress.

Conclusion

Stress and malnutrition in early life have a major impact on the well-being of the infant, which exerts its effect into adulthood. Stress-reducing programs and tar-geted nutritional interventions for both mother and child may alleviate the long-term consequences of early-life adversity.

Conflicts of Interest Statement

J.B.G. is founder and director of the Dutch National Human Milk Bank and member of the National Health Council. The other authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

1    Gluckman PD, Hanson MA. Living with the past: evolution, development, and patterns of disease. Science. 2004 Sep;305(5691):1733-6.
2    Tau GZ, Peterson BS. Normal development of brain circuits. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010 Jan;35(1):147-68.
3    Lebel C, Deoni S. The development of brain white matter microstructure. Neuroimage. 2018 Nov;182:207-218.
4    Loman MM, Gunnar MR. Early experience and the development of stress reactivity and regulation in children. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 May;34(6):867-76.
5    Pesonen AK, et al. Cognitive ability and decline after early life stress exposure. Neurobiol Aging. 2013 Jun;34(6):1674-9.
6    Alastalo H, et al. Early life stress and physical and psychosocial functioning in late adulthood. PLoS One. 2013 Jul;8(7):e69011.
7    Bourre JM. Effects of nutrients (in food) on the structure and function of the nervous system: Update on dietary requirements for brain. Part 1: Micronutrients. J Nutr Health Aging. Sep-Oct 2006;10(5):377-85.
8    Prado EL, Dewey KG. Nutrition and brain devel-opment in early life. Nutr Rev. 2014 Apr;72(4):267-84.
9    Lucassen PJ, Naninck EFG, van Goudoever JB, et al. Perinatal programming of adult hippocampal structure and function; emerging roles of stress, nutrition and epigenetics. Trends Neurosci. 2013 Nov;36(11):621-31.
10    Norman RE, Byambaa M, De R, Butchart A, Scott J, Vos T. The long-term health consequences of child physical abuse, emotional abuse, and neglect: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2012;9(11):e1001349.
11    Ritchie K, et al. Adverse childhood environment and late-life cognitive functioning. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011 May;26(5):503-10.
12    Hughes K, et al. The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health. 2017 Aug;2(8):e356-e366.
13    Bellis MA, Hughes K, Ford K, et al. Life course health consequences and associated annual costs of adverse childhood experiences across Europe and North America: a systematic review and me- ta-analysis. Lancet Public Health. 2019 Oct;4(10):e517-e528.
14    Chan JC, Nugent BM, Bale TL. Parental advisory: maternal and paternal stress can impact offspring neurodevelopment. Biol Psychiatry. 2018 May;83(10):886-894.
15    Buss C, Davis EP, Hobel CJ, Sandman CA. Maternal pregnancy-specific anxiety is associated with child executive function at 69 years age. Stress. 2011 Nov;14(6):665-76.
16    Maselko J, Kubzansky L, Lipsitt L, Buka SL. Mother's affection at 8 months predicts emotional distress in adulthood. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011 Jul;65(7):621-5.
17    Feldman R, Singer M, Zagoory O. Touch attenuates infants' physiological reactivity to stress. Dev Sci. 2010 Mar;13(2):271-8.
18    van Hasselt FN, et al. Adult hippocampal gluco-corticoid receptor expression and dentate synaptic plasticity correlate with maternal care received by individuals early in life. Hippocampus. 2012 Feb;22(2):255-66.
19    Weaver ICG, et al. Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior. Nat Neurosci. 2004 Aug;7(8):847-54.
20    Chatterjee D, Chatterjee-Chakraborty M, Rees S, et al. Maternal isolation alters the expression of neural proteins during development: “Stroking” stimulation reverses these effects. Brain Res. 2007 Jul;1158:11-27.
21    Georgieff MK, Brunette KE, Tran PV. Early life nutrition and neural plasticity. Dev Psycho- pathol. 2015 May;27(2):411-23.
22    De Rooij SR, Wouters H, Yonker JE, et al. Prenatal undernutrition and cognitive function in late adulthood. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010 Sep;107(39):16881-6.
23    Yehuda R, Engel SM, Brand SR, et al. Transgen- erational effects of posttraumatic stress disorder in babies of mothers exposed to the World Trade Center attacks during pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Jul;90(7):4115-8.
24    Campoy C, Escolano-Margarit V, Anjos T, et al. Omega 3 fatty acids on child growth, visual acuity and neurodevelopment. Br J Nutr. 2012 Jun;107 Suppl 2:S85-106.
25    Nosarti C, Murray RM, Hack M. Neurodevelop- mental Outcomes of Preterm Birth: From Child-hood to Adult Life. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-versity Press; 2010.
26    Twilhaar ES, Wade RM, De Kieviet JF, et al. Cog-nitive outcomes of children born extremely or very preterm since the 1990s and associated risk factors: A meta-analysis and meta-regression. JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Apr;172(4):361-367.
27    Koletzko B, Poindexter B, Uauy R, editors. Nutri-tional Care of Preterm Infants. Basel: Karger; 2014.
28    Sandman CA, Buss C, Head K, Davis EP. Fetal exposure to maternal depressive symptoms is associated with cortical thickness in late child-hood. Biol Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;77(4):324-34.
29    Frodl T, Reinhold E, Koutsouleris N, et al. Inter-action of childhood stress with hippocampus and prefrontal cortex volume reduction in major de-pression. J Psychiatr Res. 2010 Oct;44(13):799- 807.
30    De Brito SA, et al. Reduced orbitofrontal and temporal grey matter in a community sample of maltreated children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Discip. 2013 Jan;54(1):105-12.
31    Hanson JL, et al. Early stress is associated with alterations in the orbitofrontal cortex: A tensor-based morphometry investigation of brain structure and behavioral risk. J Neurosci. 2010 Jun;30(22):7466-72.
32    Dannlowski U, et al. Limbic scars: Long-term consequences of childhood maltreatment revealed by functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging. Biol Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;71(4):286-93.
33    Heim CM, Mayberg HS, Mletzko T, et al. Decreased cortical representation of genital somatosensory field after childhood sexual abuse. Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;170(6):616-23.
34    Hanson JL, et al. Behavioral problems after early life stress: contributions of the hippocampus and amygdala. Biol Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;77(4):314- 23.
35    Teicher MH, Samson JA. Annual research review: enduring neurobiological effects of childhood abuse and neglect. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016 Mar;57(3):241-66.
36    Rice CJ, Sandman CA, Lenjavi MR, Baram TZ. A novel mouse model for acute and long-lasting consequences of early life stress. Endocrinology. 2008 Oct;149(10):4892-900.
37    Oomen CA, et al. Severe early life stress hampers spatial learning and neurogenesis, but improves hippocampal synaptic plasticity and emotional learning under high-stress conditions in adulthood. J Neurosci. 2010 May;30(19):6635-45.
38    Huot RL, Plotsky PM, Lenox RH, McNamara RK. Neonatal maternal separation reduces hippocampal mossy fiber density in adult Long Evans rats. Brain Res. 2002 Sep;950(1-2):52-63.
39    De Rooij SR, et al. Prenatal famine exposure has sex-specific effects on brain size. Brain. 2016 Aug;139(Pt 8):2136-42.
40    Tran PV, Fretham SJB, Wobken J, et al. Gestational-neonatal iron deficiency suppresses and iron treatment reactivates IGF signaling in developing rat hippocampus. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Feb;302(3):E316-24.
41    Nederhof E, Schmidt MV. Mismatch or cumulative stress: toward an integrated hypothesis of programming effects. Physiol Behav. 2012 Jul;106(5):691-700.
42    Frankenhuis WE, Young ES, Ellis BJ. The hidden talents approach: theoretical and methodological challenges. Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Jul;24(7):569- 581.
43    Lindsay KL, Buss C, Wadhwa PD, Entringer S. The interplay between maternal nutrition and stress during pregnancy: issues and considerations. Ann Nutr Metab. 2017;70(3):191-200.
44    Yam KY, Naninck EFG, Schmidt MV, Lucassen PJ, Korosi A. Early-life adversity programs emotional functions and the neuroendocrine stress system: the contribution of nutrition, metabolic hormones and epigenetic mechanisms. Stress. 2015;18(3):328-42.
45    Abe H, et al. Prenatal psychological stress causes higher emotionality, depression-like behavior, and elevated activity in the hypothalamo-pitu- itary-adrenal axis. Neurosci Res. 2007 Oct;59(2):145-51.
46    Herbert J, et al. Do corticosteroids damage the brain? J Neuroendocrinol. 2006 Jun;18(6):393- 411.
47    Proulx K. High neonatal leptin exposure enhances brain GR expression and feedback efficacy on the adrenocortical axis of developing rats. Endo-crinology. 2001 Nov;142(11):4607-16.
48    Szyf M. The epigenetics of perinatal stress. Dia-logues Clin Neurosci. 2019 Dec;21(4):369-378.
49    Naumova OY, Lee M, Koposov R, et al. Differential patterns of whole-genome DNA methylation in institutionalized children and children raised by their biological parents. Dev Psychopathol. 2012 Feb;24(1):143-55.
50    Dominguez-Salas P, et al. Maternal nutrition at conception modulates DNA methylation of human metastable epialleles. Nat Commun. 2014 Apr;5:3746.
51    Levine A, Worrell TR, Zimnisky R, Schmauss C. Early life stress triggers sustained changes in his-tone deacetylase expression and histone H4 mod-ifications that alter responsiveness to adolescent antidepressant treatment. Neurobiol Dis. 2012 Jan;45(1):488-98.
52    Stevens AJ, Rucklidge JJ, Kennedy MA. Epi-genetics, nutrition and mental health. Is there a relationship? Nutr Neurosci. 2018 Nov;21(9):602-613.
53    Dennery PA. Oxidative stress in development: nature or nurture? Free Radic Biol Med. 2010 Oct;49(7):1147-51.
54    do Prado CH, et al. The impact of childhood mal-treatment on redox state: Relationship with oxi-dative damage and antioxidant defenses in ado-lescents with no psychiatric disorder. Neurosci Lett. 2016 Mar;617:173-7.
55    Bjorklund G, Chirumbolo S. Role of oxidative stress and antioxidants in daily nutrition and human health. Nutrition. 2017 Jan;33:311-321.
56    Te Braake FWJ, et al. Glutathione synthesis rates after amino acid administration directly after birth in preterm infants. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Aug;88(2):333-9.
57    Hoeijmakers L, Lucassen PJ, Korosi A. The inter-play of early-life stress, nutrition, and immune activation programs adult hippocampal structure and function. Front Mol Neurosci. 2015 Jan;7:103.
58    Bilbo SD, Schwarz JM. The immune system and developmental programming of brain and behavior. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2012 Aug;33(3):267- 86.
59    O'Connor TG, Moynihan JA, Caserta MT. Annual research review: the neuroinflammation hypothesis for stress and psychopathology in children
- developmental psychoneuroimmunology. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;55(6):615-31.
60    Eriksen W, Sundet JM, Tambs K. Register data suggest lower intelligence in men born the year after flu pandemic. Ann Neurol. 2009 Sep;66(3):284-9.
61    Dinel AL, et al. Inflammation early in life is a vul-nerability factor for emotional behavior at ado-lescence and for lipopolysaccharide-induced spa-tial memory and neurogenesis alteration at adulthood. J Neuroinflammation. 2014 Sep;11:155.
62    Palacio A, Lopez M, Perez-Bravo F, et al. Leptin levels are associated with immune response in malnourished infants. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002 Jul;87(7):3040-6.
63    Tan BL, Norhaizan ME, Liew WPP. Nutrients and oxidative stress: friend or foe? Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2018 Jan;2018:9719584.
64    Radzikowska U, et al. The influence of dietary fatty acids on immune responses. Nutrients. 2019 Dec;11(12):2990.
65    Osadchiy V, Martin CR, Mayer EA. The gut-brain axis and the microbiome: mechanisms and clinical implications. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan;17(2):322-332.
66    Huang CF, et al. Effect of prenatal exposure to LPS combined with pre- and post-natal high-fat diet on hippocampus in rat offspring. Neuroscience. 2015 Feb;286:364-70.
67    Rincel M, et al. Maternal high-fat diet prevents developmental programming by early-life stress. Transl Psychiatry. 2016 Nov;6(11):e966.
68    Yam KY, et al. Increasing availability of w-3 fatty acid in the early-life diet prevents the early-life stress-induced cognitive impairments without affecting metabolic alterations. FASEB J. 2019 Apr;33(4):5729-5740.
69    Naninck EFG, et al. Early micronutrient supple-mentation protects against early stress-induced cognitive impairments. FASEB J. 2017 Feb;31(2):505-518.
70    Schulz KM, et al. Dietary choline supplementation to dams during pregnancy and lactation mitigates the effects of in utero stress exposure on adult anxiety-related behaviors. Behav Brain Res. 2014 Jul;268:104-10.
71    Yajima M, Matsumoto M, Harada M, Hara H, Yajima T. Effects of constant light during perinatal periods on the behavioral and neuronal devel-opment of mice with or without dietary lutein. Biomed Res. 2013 Aug;34(4):197-204.
72    Lipton LR, et al. Associations among prenatal stress, maternal antioxidant intakes in pregnancy, and child temperament at age 30 months. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2017 Dec;8(6):638-648.
73    Brunst KJ, et al. Effects of prenatal social stress and maternal dietary fatty acid ratio on infant temperament: does race matter? Epidemiology (Sunnyvale). 2014;4(4):1000167.
74    Barker ED, Kirkham N, Ng J, Jensen SKG. Prenatal maternal depression symptoms and nutrition, and child cognitive function. Br J Psychiatry. 2013 Dec;203(6):417-21.
75    Stephens BE, et al. First-week protein and energy intakes are associated with 18-month develop-mental outcomes in extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2009 May;123(5):1337-43.
76    Eleni dit Trolli S, Kermorvant-Duchemin E, Huon C, et al. Early lipid supply and neurological development at one year in very low birth weight (VLBW) preterm infants. Early Hum Dev. 2012 Mar;88 Suppl 1:S25-9.
77    Ambalavanan N, et al. Vitamin A supplementation for extremely low birth weight infants: outcome at 18 to 22 months. Pediatrics. 2005 Mar;115(3):e249-54.
78    Jin HX, Wang RS, Chen SJ, et al. Early and late iron supplementation for low birth weight infants: a meta-analysis. Ital J Pediatr. 2015 Mar;41:16.
79    Urizar GG, Yim IS, Rodriguez A, Schetter CD. The SMART Moms Program: a randomized trial of the impact of stress management on perceived stress and cortisol in low-income pregnant women. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2019 Jun;104:174-184.
80    Lenz B, et al. Mindfulness-based stress reduction in pregnancy: an app-based programme to improve the health of mothers and children (MIND- FUL/PMI Study). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2018 Dec;78(12):1283-1291.
81    Franck LS, O'Brien K. The evolution of family-centered care: from supporting parent-delivered interventions to a model of family integrated care. Birth Defects Res. 2019 Sep;111(15):1044- 1059.
82    van Veenendaal NR, et al. Hospitalising preterm infants in single family rooms versus open bay units: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Child Adolesc Heal. 2019 Mar;3(3):147- 157.
83    van Veenendaal NR, et al. Family integrated care in single family rooms for preterm infants and late-onset sepsis: a retrospective study and mediation analysis. Pediatr Res. 2020 Oct;88(4):593- 600.
84    Moirasgenti M, Doulougeri K, Panagopoulou E, Theodoridis T. Psychological stress reduces the immunological benefits of breast milk. Stress Health. 2019 Dec;35(5):681-685.
85    Browne PD, et al. Human milk microbiome and maternal postnatal psychosocial distress. Front Microbiol. 2019 Oct;10:2333.

Professor Hans van Goudoever

Hans van Goudoever

About Author